AI Provider Selection
Fixed price after questionnaire - 8-10 weeks
Productised, questionnaire-led evaluation across Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok.
Who This Is For
This service is for organisations that:
- Need to choose between Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Grok for specific use cases
- Want hands-on model testing before committing to a provider
- Need evidence-based selection for coding, analysis, drafting, or research
- Want a defensible model mix rather than a single-vendor bet
The Challenge
Most model selections are driven by hype, not evidence. Common problems:
- One model is forced to do everything
- No consistent evaluation criteria
- Vendor marketing replaces testing
- Results vary by use case and prompt quality
You need use-case-specific testing and a defensible provider mix.
What You Get
Evaluation organised around the 5 Questions Framework:
WHY - Define Use-Case Priorities
- Use-case mapping by function
- Success criteria for each use case
- Decision priorities
WHO - Define Users & Constraints
- User groups and access boundaries
- Security and privacy constraints
- Operational limits
WHAT - Test Criteria
- Accuracy, safety, and reliability benchmarks
- Latency and cost thresholds
- Prompt and evaluation harness
HOW - Provider Evaluation
- Model-by-use-case testing
- Provider strengths/weaknesses by scenario
- Recommended provider mix
WHEN - Adoption Plan
- Sequencing by use case
- Pilot and scale plan
- Integration roadmap
How It Works
Weeks 1-2: Discovery & Assessment
Questionnaire-led discovery with focused stakeholder interviews, current capability assessment, and use-case identification.
Weeks 3-5: Evaluation Design & Testing
Define evaluation criteria, build the test harness, and run model-by-use-case testing across shortlisted providers.
Weeks 6-7: Analysis & Recommendation
Synthesize results into a defensible provider mix with strengths, weaknesses, and trade-offs by scenario.
Weeks 8-10: Roadmap & Handover
Deliver the adoption plan, integration guidance, and executive presentation.
Final Deliverables
You receive comprehensive documentation including:
Provider-by-Use-Case Matrix
Side-by-side evaluation results across coding, analysis, drafting, and research
Evaluation Criteria & Benchmarks
Testing framework with acceptance thresholds and scoring
Recommended Provider Mix
Defensible provider selection with rationale and constraints
Integration Guidance
Practical guidance for implementation partners and internal teams
Adoption Roadmap
Sequenced rollout plan with pilots and scaling steps
Executive Summary
Board-ready overview of findings and recommendations
Why This Approach Works
Evidence Over Hype
Recommendations are grounded in tested outcomes, not vendor marketing.
Independent and Vendor-Neutral
No partnerships or incentives. The best fit wins on merit.
Use-Case Specific
Different models excel at different tasks. Your provider mix reflects that reality.
Implementation-Ready
Clear criteria, test evidence, and integration guidance ready for execution.
Investment
Fee: Fixed price after questionnaire
Timeline: 8-10 weeks from kickoff to final delivery
Payment: 50% at start, 50% at delivery
Fixed scope: Confirmed after the questionnaire to ensure fit and pricing clarity
What's included: Discovery, testing, evaluation, documentation, and executive presentation
What's not included: Implementation, vendor costs, or ongoing advisory (available separately)
Ready to Start?
Book a free 30-minute call to discuss your AI provider selection.